How to lower price of power
By Mitchell Schnurman
Star-Telegram Staff Writer
John Bick makes his living by tracking energy prices, so he knows how to play the
game. In July, when natural gas prices dipped, he locked in a low rate for electricity
for the next year, and he's saving $87 a month on his Arlington home's electric bill.
Sounds like a no-brainer, but he's taking a risk.
In January, the Texas electric market deregulates fully, ending the price-to-beat benchmark used by TXU
in North Texas. Some analysts believe that retail rates could drop sharply then, and Bick's good deal may
not look so good anymore.
"So what?" he said. "I'll just pay the cancellation fee and make a switch."
The fee is $150, a hit that would discourage most consumers. But Bick's calculation is straightforward: If
he can cut a few pennies off his rate, he'll make up the penalty in a few months.
You don't have to be an energy consultant to make this kind of hard-nosed assessment. Just accept the
notion that managing energy costs is another modern burden -- and opportunity -- akin to managing a
401(k) or a healthcare savings account.
Most of us monitor gasoline prices, airfares and stock-market returns, and we regularly research the
Internet for good deals. We need to adopt the same mind-set for electricity, especially with summer bills
topping $400.
This is not as easy as zipping through three or four Web sites to buy a plane ticket. The fine print is
voluminous, the learning curve is fairly steep, and entrepreneurs are still developing tools to simplify the
comparison process.
But the basic concept is the same as with most big purchases: Learn how the electric market works. Shop
around frequently. And keep an eye on bigger trends, because a better deal may surface -- and you can't
count on the current provider to tell you about it.
That doesn't mean there are real bargains out there today. In North Texas, residential rates are among
country's highest, and we're paying 50 percent more than customers in Austin and other cities with
municipally owned utilities.
TXU, meanwhile, is making huge profits. The utility benefits because its benchmark rate was set soon
after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Natural gas prices have fallen since then, but TXU has no obligation to
ask regulators to lower the figure.
So the benchmark rate is about 15 percent higher than it ought to be.
The frustration is that competitors aren't slashing their prices to lure away thousands of customers. That's
how it was supposed to work, but retailers seem comfortable with fatter margins.
What can consumers do? Get more informed and more active. Most know their car's gas mileage, but how
many know their electric rate?
The private sector can start rolling out innovations, such as more-detailed Web sites and ways to combine
residential customers so they have more buying power.
And cities may have a function; in other states, they have been important aggregators, combining
thousands of residents into a single buying group.
When these pieces come together and the price-to-beat benchmark goes away, maybe we'll see more real
competition for residential customers.
Big companies have capitalized on the Texas system since deregulation began in 2002. They have more
motivation to manage energy costs because their bills are so high, and brokers quickly pitched moneysaving
proposals.
Power providers are also willing to cut deals with big users. In contrast, a single homeowner gets the
retail price only.
Maybe that's why 70 percent of the commercial power load in Texas has changed providers at least once,
while just 30 percent of residential users have switched.
Bick, a former TXU executive, jumped into the deregulated marketplace as a consultant to big companies.
At Priority Power Management, he advises companies on locking in rates, changing providers and other
strategies to reduce costs.
The company has about 700 clients, including the City of Midland, Doskocil Manufacturing in Arlington,
and Hillwood, the giant real-estate arm of Ross Perot Jr.
Because Hillwood wants to support renewable energy sources, all the electricity it buys is generated from
wind power. That's a laudable goal. Hillwood is paying the same for wind power as it would for
electricity from traditional sources. That's the deal a company can get when it spends $730,000 a year on
electricity and uses a consultant to leverage its position.
Residents who want to use wind power, however, have to pay 24 percent more than the lowest rate now
available in North Texas.
"If we'd done nothing at all, we'd be paying the going rate," says Tom Harris, Hillwood's senior vice
president of operations and administration. "But even with some expertise, it's a bit of a guessing game."
For one corporate customer, Bick recommended an exotic hedging strategy: Lock in the rate for plant
capacity and the retailer's margin, and let the price of natural gas float. That customer has saved $460,000
so far this year, Bick said, because natural gas prices have trended down.
This is a level of sophistication that's beyond most residential customers. Even if they knew about this
approach, they don't buy enough power to justify the arrangement.
Maybe middlemen could do it, though, and Bick's firm has ventured into that territory. This summer, it
launched a Web site, ChooseEnergy.com, that offers electric deals to residential customers.
It competes with powertochoose.com, the state-sponsored site that lists all the electric retailers. Other
shopping sites have emerged, including saveonenergy.com and electricitytexas.com.
Bick's site has a unique wrinkle: Rates are set in real time.
If there's a drop in natural gas prices, providers can change the rate that morning, and consumers can
jump on the deal immediately. The state site, in contrast, says the lag time can extend for 48 hours before
rates are changed.
This isn't much of an advantage if energy companies don't respond quickly to shifts in natural gas and
consumer demand. But the hope is that eventually, these forces will push retailers to be more aggressive
in their pricing.
Choose Energy also adjusts for a resident's usage. Many people don't realize that some providers cut their
hourly rate at 1,500 kilowatts a month and at 2,000. As a result, one offer may be better than it appears on
the state site, where usage is assumed to be 1,000 kilowatts a month.
Bick, who's president of Choose Energy, plans to add an e-mail service to alert consumers if natural gas
prices fall or a retailer offers a discount promotion. In theory, the site could negotiate the complex trading
schemes that Bick works out for corporate clients, making them available to a larger group.
Another area ripe for innovation: bundling residential customers who are willing to ration their power in
the late afternoon. That's when demand is greatest, and many residents would accept some restrictions if
the savings were sufficient.
These are the types of ideas that have to flourish if Texas is going to find ways to get power for less.
Consumers can't do it alone, but they have a big role to play.
The frustration is that competitors aren't slashing their prices to lure away thousands of customers. That's
how it was supposed to work, but retailers seem comfortable with fatter margins.
Mitchell Schnurman, 817-390-7821 schnurman@star-telegram.com